If you’ve ever hosted a social gathering, you might be familiar with the phenomena of the guest who wouldn’t leave. Such a guest overstays their welcome and becomes a great source of annoyance.

Learn How to Protect Your Real Estate through Asset Protection today!

Now imagine how frustrating it would be to have someone come onto your property uninvited, and then they decide to live there. Unfortunately, it’s something that happens from time to time. It’s called “squatting.”

Key Takeaways: for Squatter’s Rights

• Squatters’ rights, or Adverse Possession, refer to the rights a squatter may gain if they occupy a property for a certain period without the owner taking legal action against them.
• The time frame for establishing squatters’ rights varies by state, ranging from 7 years to over 20 years.
• Squatting is a form of trespassing but involves the intention of claiming ownership or permanent residency.
• Property owners must follow a legal eviction process to remove squatters, typically beginning with a call to local law enforcement and filing an Unlawful Detainer Action.
• In some cases, squatters may pay property taxes to strengthen their adverse possession claim, but owners should continue paying their taxes as well.
• Property owners and landlords should familiarize themselves with squatters’ rights and consult an attorney when necessary to ensure proper handling of such situations.

Which States Have Squatters’ Rights?

Most states have laws regarding squatters’ rights. It just depends on how long the squatter has been occupying the property. Here is a table showing how long it takes for squatters’ rights to be established in each state:

20+ Years
Delaware | Georgia | Hawaii | Idaho | Illinois | Louisiana | Maine | Maryland | Massachusetts | New Jersey | North Carolina | North Dakota | Ohio | Pennsylvania | South Dakota | Wisconsin

[ Don’t Miss our Next Tax & Asset Protection Workshop! ]

15-20 Years
Colorado | Connecticut | Kansas | Kentucky | Michigan | Minnesota | Nevada | Oklahoma | Vermont | Virginia

10 Years
Alabama | Alaska | Arizona | Indiana | Iowa | Mississippi | Missouri | Nebraska | New Mexico | New York | Oregan | Rhode Island | South Carolina | Texas | Washington | West Virginia | Wyoming

7 Years or Less
Arkansas | California | Florida | Montana | Tennessee | Utah

History of Squatting

In the days of the Wild West, ranch owners could deal with errant squatters by riding out in a posse and chasing the squatters off their land. Obviously, a lot has changed since the days of stage coaches and gold rushes, because nearly every state has laws stating a landlord cannot use force or the threat of force to disburse squatters from their property. Instead, they must file the proper paperwork and work through legal channels.

The idea of squatting goes back to medieval England and its common law. The king’s courts would routinely rule in favor of individuals who occupied a property without permission, providing the owner did not take action against them within a certain statute of limitations.

Back in those days, squatter conflict routinely come into play when peasants seeking escape from the tax burden of their current location would move into the country and build a house on the land, acquiring the property by assumption (a common practice at the time).

Ancient Welsh folk tradition states that if a person can build a home on common land in one night, it would belong to them free and clear. This is known as a “the one-night house.” Other variants of the belief specify that a squatter would need to have a fire burning in the hearth by morning, whereupon they could extend the boundaries of their newly acquired property by throwing an axe as far as possible from all four corners of the home.

Thankfully in the United States, such practices are no longer applicable. State legislatures have created a more concrete set of rules regarding squatting.

However, if an individual unlawfully takes possession of a property and occupies it consistently for a certain period of time, they may actually establish a stronger claim to the property than the actual owner. Though it sounds bizarre, squatting is quite common, and a popular tool used by ill-intentioned individuals to take possession of abandoned properties.

What is a Squatter?

A squatter is anyone who begins to inhabit a piece of property or land without the legal right to do so. In other words, they are not renting the property from the owner (where landlord-tenant law comes into play) and they do not have permission to use it.

You might think an unauthorized occupant would be easy to eject from a residential property or vacant retail property (especially when there is no lease agreement to content with), but an unauthorized tenant (or adverse possessor, as they are called in the legal world) has the right to go through an eviction process. The rightful owner of the property must act within a certain statutory period (outlined above state by state) before the adverse possession law in their state gives legal title to the squatter who has taken possession of the real property.

It seems like a nightmare come true, but it’s a perfect example of why real estate should never be considered a completely passive income. It’s important to check up on real property, especially vacant property, and make sure that nothing will impede on your valid and legal claims to it.

What Are Squatters’ Rights?

Squatter’s rights (also known as adverse possession) allow a squatter to continue their use/occupation of a property in the event that the true owner or landlord does not take action within a certain time frame.

Why Squatters’ Rights Exist: The Legal and Historical Rationale

Adverse possession is not a modern loophole invented to punish careless landlords; it descends from centuries-old common law principles that predate the United States, developed originally to resolve disputes over land whose true ownership had become unclear or effectively abandoned. The doctrine served two purposes historically: it encouraged productive use of land rather than allowing property to sit idle indefinitely, and it created a practical statute of limitations on ownership disputes, so that after enough time had passed with an owner failing to assert their rights, courts would resolve the uncertainty rather than leave title permanently contestable.

The doctrine also serves a public-order function that remains relevant today. Without a legal framework requiring formal eviction, property owners would have strong incentive to remove unwanted occupants through force or intimidation, and the law generally prefers to channel property disputes through courts rather than self-help, precisely because self-help disputes escalate unpredictably and create broader safety and liability concerns. That said, the doctrine has become genuinely controversial in recent years as courts and legislatures grapple with a meaningful rise in bad-faith squatting — cases where individuals deliberately target occupied or recently vacated homes, sometimes using fraudulent leases or fabricated documentation, rather than the traditional adverse-possession scenario of a long-neglected, effectively abandoned parcel. Several states, including Florida, have responded by passing legislation that makes it substantially faster for property owners to remove unauthorized occupants who cannot produce evidence of a lease or rent payment, and this legislative trend is likely to continue as more states respond to public pressure over high-profile squatting incidents.

Squatting vs. Trespassing vs. Holdover Tenancy: Why the Distinction Matters

Every unauthorized occupant on your property fits into one of three legal categories, and confusing them is the single most common mistake property owners make when they discover someone living on land or in a building they own. A trespasser is someone who enters property unlawfully without any intention of establishing residency or an ownership claim; because there is no claim of right, law enforcement can typically remove a trespasser immediately, without a court process, particularly if the property is owner-occupied. A squatter is different in kind, not just degree: a squatter occupies property with the implicit or explicit intention of establishing residency, and in many states that intention — combined with enough time — triggers landlord-tenant-style legal protections that require a formal eviction process rather than a simple police removal, even though the squatter never signed a lease and never paid rent.

A holdover tenant is a third, frequently confused category: someone who had a legitimate lease that has since expired but who remains on the property, often continuing to pay rent under the same terms. Holdover tenants are not squatters and cannot claim adverse possession, because their original occupancy was lawful; if a landlord accepts continued rent from a holdover tenant, that tenant typically becomes a “tenant at will,” which the landlord can generally terminate without the extended notice period required for a true eviction. The practical significance of these distinctions is enormous — the removal process, the required paperwork, and the timeline all differ depending on which category applies, and misclassifying the occupant can cost a landlord months of delay or expose them to liability for an improper self-help eviction.

The Five Legal Elements of an Adverse Possession Claim

Occupying a property is not, by itself, enough to establish squatters’ rights. Courts across nearly every state apply a version of the same five-part legal test, and a squatter’s claim fails if even one element is missing — which is precisely why property owners who understand this test are in a far stronger position to defeat a claim than those who only know the statutory time limit.

Possession must first be continuous, meaning the squatter has occupied the property without meaningful interruption for the entire statutory period; leaving for an extended stretch and returning later generally resets the clock. Second, possession must be actual, meaning the squatter must physically occupy and use the property as an owner would — living in it, maintaining it, and in many jurisdictions making improvements, rather than merely visiting occasionally. Third, possession must be open and notorious, meaning the squatter cannot hide their presence; neighbors, the property owner, and the broader community must be able to observe that someone is living there, because the law effectively expects the true owner to have had a fair opportunity to notice and object. Fourth, possession must typically be exclusive, meaning the squatter is not sharing the property with the general public or the true owner. Fifth, and most legally nuanced, possession must be hostile — a term that does not require aggression or confrontation but simply means the squatter is occupying the property without the owner’s permission. States define “hostile” in one of three ways: simple occupation without regard to the squatter’s knowledge of ownership, a good-faith mistaken belief that the squatter has some claim to the property (sometimes strengthened by an invalid or defective deed, known as “color of title”), or, in a smaller number of states, an occupation undertaken with full awareness that the squatter has no legal right to be there. Which definition a state applies can materially change how a claim is evaluated and how quickly a property owner can defeat it.

Learn how to protect your real estate through a comprehensive asset protection strategy — download Anderson Advisors’ free guide today.

How Long Does It Take to Establish Squatters’ Rights? State-by-State Timelines

The statutory period a squatter must satisfy before even attempting an adverse possession claim varies dramatically by state, and this variance is one of the most consequential facts a property owner can know, because it directly determines how much time you have to notice and act before a squatter’s position strengthens meaningfully. In addition to time, most states require the squatter to have paid property taxes during some or all of the occupancy period in order to succeed, and several states reduce the required time frame if the squatter holds “color of title” — a defective or otherwise invalid deed that nonetheless gives the appearance of ownership.

These figures are a starting reference point, not a final answer — several states attach additional wrinkles to their timelines. Some shorten the period substantially if the squatter has paid property taxes throughout the occupancy or holds color of title; others require none of that and rely purely on the passage of time combined with the five elements described above. Because statutes are amended periodically and courts interpret “continuous” and “hostile” possession differently across jurisdictions, property owners facing an active or suspected adverse possession situation should confirm the current statute and relevant case law in their specific state with a qualified real estate attorney rather than relying on a general timeline alone.

How to Legally Remove a Squatter From Your Property?

Removing a squatter is a legal process, not a physical one — in nearly every state, using force, threats, changing the locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a squatter’s belongings without going through the proper legal channels exposes the property owner to civil liability and, in some jurisdictions, criminal charges, regardless of how clearly unauthorized the squatter’s presence is. The process is procedural and requires patience, but understanding each step in advance meaningfully shortens the practical timeline.

The first step is documentation and law enforcement contact. Even though police typically cannot remove a squatter immediately once they claim residency, filing a police report creates an official record and demonstrates that you acted promptly upon discovering the occupation — a fact that matters both for defeating a future adverse possession claim and for establishing your case in the eviction proceeding that follows. The second step is filing an Unlawful Detainer Action, which formally initiates the legal eviction process; the exact procedure, required notice period, and filing venue vary meaningfully by state, which is why this step should be handled with, or at minimum reviewed by, a real estate attorney familiar with your jurisdiction. The third step is the court hearing itself: assuming the squatter does not vacate voluntarily after being served, a hearing date is set, and if — as is typical when the occupant genuinely has no lawful claim — the court rules in the property owner’s favor, the judge issues a writ of restitution directing local law enforcement to remove the occupant. The fourth and final step, handling any belongings left behind, is more legally sensitive than most owners expect: many states require a formal written notice period before an owner may dispose of or sell abandoned property, and some require newspaper publication of the notice; failing to follow the correct procedure can itself expose the owner to a claim from the former occupant.

If you’re currently navigating an active squatter situation, don’t wait for the problem to escalate. Speak with an Anderson Professional Advisor for a free Strategy Session

Do Squatters Pay Property Taxes?

In many states, a squatter is required to have paid property taxes for some or all of the statutory period in order to succeed on an adverse possession claim — this requirement exists precisely because tax payment is treated by courts as objective evidence of the “open and notorious” and “hostile” elements described earlier, since paying taxes on a property you don’t legally own is a visible, public act. But this requirement is not universal; several states allow an adverse possession claim to proceed without any tax payment at all, relying instead purely on continuous, open occupation.

Critically, whether or not a squatter is paying taxes on your property, you should never stop paying your own. Some property owners mistakenly believe that if a squatter is paying taxes, they can let that payment substitute for their own, or that ceasing payment somehow weakens the squatter’s position — in reality, allowing your own tax payments to lapse only strengthens the appearance that you have abandoned the property, which cuts directly against you if a dispute ever reaches court.

A Property Owner Needs to Be Familiar with Squatters’ Rights

The idea of someone unlawfully entering your property and taking possession of it may seem impossible, but property owners beware: it can happen.

While you might think of a squatter as a homeless individual with limited legal resources, don’t make any assumptions. There are many reasons squatters rights can come into play—estate disputes and a holdover tenant from previous rental property agreements are both prime examples.

This is why anyone learning how to become a landlord must familiarize themselves with the legal rights and processes associated with tenants, squatters, and trespassers. It’s also a good idea to consult with an attorney should any questions regarding these laws arise. You hope that you never have to deal with a squatter, but should you need to, you’ll be glad to have an expert in your corner.

Bonus Video

Receive a detailed risk assessment to assist in lowering problem areas that could wipe out all of your assets with one wrong move. Speak with an Anderson Professional Advisor to get your FREE Strategy Session. Limited-Time offer: FREE (a $750 value.)

How Asset Protection Structures Reduce Your Exposure

Physical prevention reduces the odds a squatter targets your property, but it does nothing to limit your financial and legal exposure if a squatting situation does occur — and that is where ownership structure becomes strategically important in a way none of the standard landlord guides address. Real estate investors who hold title to rental property directly, in their own name, are personally exposed to the full range of costs and liabilities a squatting dispute can generate: litigation expenses, potential counterclaims from the squatter, and — in the worst-case scenario — the risk that an unresolved adverse possession claim clouds title to the entire property. Holding property inside a properly structured LLC, or layering an anonymity-focused land trust on top of the LLC, does not prevent a squatter from occupying the property, but it does compartmentalize the liability, keeping a dispute on one property from exposing an investor’s other assets or personal wealth.

Beyond liability compartmentalization, entity structuring also affects the practical mechanics of an eviction. A property held in a properly documented LLC has a clear, provable chain of ownership that strengthens a landlord’s position when demonstrating standing in court — an underappreciated advantage when speed matters and a squatter’s attorney is looking for any procedural weakness to exploit. For investors managing several properties across multiple states, this structural approach scales in a way ad hoc precautions cannot: a consistent entity and land trust framework across a portfolio means every property benefits from the same baseline protection, rather than each one being only as protected as whatever the owner happened to think to do at that specific address.

Not sure whether your current ownership structure actually protects you? Learn more about Anderson Advisors’ Real Estate Asset Protection planning and see how a tailored structure fits your portfolio.

Squatting will likely never be fully eliminated as a risk of property ownership, but it is a manageable one. The property owners who fare best are not the ones who never encounter a squatter — many landlords eventually will — but the ones who understand the legal test well enough to act early, who follow the correct legal process instead of a self-help shortcut that creates its own liability, and who have structured their ownership in a way that limits the downside if a dispute does arise. Treating squatters’ rights as a foreseeable risk to plan around, rather than a surprise to react to, is ultimately what separates a costly, drawn-out ordeal from a manageable, well-handled one.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a squatter and a trespasser?

A trespasser enters property unlawfully without intending to establish residency and can generally be removed immediately by police. A squatter occupies property with the intention of living there or eventually claiming ownership, which in most states triggers landlord-tenant-style legal protections requiring a formal eviction process rather than immediate removal, even though the squatter has no lease.

How long can a squatter stay in a house before it becomes theirs?

It depends entirely on the state, ranging from as little as five to seven years in states like California and Florida to more than twenty years in states like Pennsylvania and Ohio. The squatter must also satisfy several other legal requirements, including continuous, open, and hostile possession, not just the passage of time.

Can I forcibly remove a squatter myself?

No. Nearly every state prohibits self-help eviction methods such as changing locks, removing belongings, shutting off utilities, or using force, and doing so can expose you to civil or criminal liability regardless of how clearly unauthorized the squatter’s presence is. Removal must go through the formal legal eviction process.

Do squatters have to pay property taxes to claim adverse possession?

In many states, yes — tax payment is treated as evidence supporting the “open and notorious” element of a claim. However, some states allow adverse possession claims without any tax payment requirement, so property owners should confirm the specific rule that applies in their state.

What is “color of title” in an adverse possession claim?

Color of title refers to a squatter possessing a defective, invalid, or otherwise flawed deed that creates the appearance of ownership without actually conveying it. In several states, holding color of title can shorten the required statutory period compared to a squatter with no documentation at all.

Is a holdover tenant the same as a squatter?

No. A holdover tenant had a legitimate lease that has since expired but remains on the property, often continuing to pay rent, and cannot claim adverse possession because the original occupancy was lawful. A squatter never had legal permission to occupy the property in the first place.

How can real estate investors protect a rental portfolio from squatters?

Beyond physical deterrents like inspections, lighting, and alarm systems, investors should evaluate their ownership structure — holding rental property in properly formed LLCs or land trusts compartmentalizes liability and creates a clear chain of ownership that strengthens an eviction case, protecting the rest of an investor’s portfolio if a dispute arises on one property.